According to MIT Technology Review, artificial general intelligence has evolved into something resembling a modern conspiracy theory, with believers convinced we’re just two to five years away from technology that can do everything a human brain can do. The publication argues AGI represents the most consequential conspiracy theory of our time, part of humanity’s enduring belief in imminent world-changing events. Meanwhile, China appears positioned to emerge as the AI superpower of this century through its ability to mobilize whole-of-society resources for AI development and deployment, despite Western confidence in American semiconductor expertise and research leadership.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The AGI Myth We Can’t Stop Believing
Here’s the thing about AGI: it’s always just around the corner. Two years, five years, maybe next year—the timeline keeps shifting but the faith remains unshakable. I think what makes this particular belief system so powerful is that it offers both salvation and damnation in one package. It’s going to solve all our problems and potentially destroy us all. Basically, it’s the perfect technological Rorschach test that tells us more about our own anxieties than about any actual technology.
And isn’t it fascinating how this particular myth has captured the imagination of otherwise rational people? We’ve moved from religious end-times prophecies to technological ones. The language is different but the psychological need seems remarkably similar. People want to believe they’re living through something epochal, whether that’s the second coming or the singularity.
<h2 id="china-ai-race”>Why China Might Actually Win the AI Race
Now let’s talk about the real-world competition that’s actually happening right now. While we’re debating philosophical questions about consciousness and superintelligence, China is building practical AI systems at scale. They’ve got the means, motive, and opportunity—and that’s a dangerous combination when you’re talking about technological supremacy.
The West keeps pointing to our semiconductor lead and research institutions, but that might be missing the bigger picture. China’s whole-of-society approach means they can direct resources in ways that would be politically impossible in democratic systems. They can build data infrastructure, retrain workforces, and deploy technology at a pace that’s frankly terrifying if you’re competing against it.
So what happens if China does pull ahead? We’re not just talking about economic competition anymore—we’re talking about fundamentally different visions for how AI should be developed and deployed. The stakes couldn’t be higher, and betting against China’s systematic approach seems increasingly risky. The AGI debate might be intellectually stimulating, but this is the real game being played.
